Lawyer advocates for Nuremberg 2 trials after reading Pfizer purchaser agreement

A Canadian lawyer and podcaster has changed his mind and is now advocating for legal consequences for government officials that signed deals with Pfizer.

Viva Frei, a lawyer-turned-podcaster, called for Nuremberg-style trials for government officials on X (Twitter) Wednesday evening after reading the purchaser agreement signed off on by government officials in English-speaking countries.

The point of contention was the fact that the purchaser agreement for Pfizer’s Covid vaccines admitted that long-term effects of the vaccine were unknown.

Purchaser … acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known.

The document cited was a contract between the government of South Africa and Pfizer, however, the Trudeau government in Canada allegedly signed a similar agreement.

After reading the document, Frei stated that he had changed his mind about the prospects of Nuremberg-style trials, and is now calling for legal action against government officials.

Viva Frei is a pseudonym for David Freiheit. Freiheit made a name for himself by practicing law in Montreal, before pursuing podcasting full-time.

Freiheit often uses his education and experience as a lawyer to comment on political matters, although it not clear whether he is still licensed to practice law in Canada.

Nuremberg 2

“Nuremberg 2” refers to a proposed set of trials for government officials, health professionals, and corporate leaders that pushed the Covid-19 vaccine. The website MedPage Today explains the concept:

The idea is that the COVID-19 vaccines constitute medical experimentation, and anyone who promotes them — including doctors — should be held accountable, in the way that members of the Nazi Party were executed following the Nuremberg trials.

There is dispute over whether Nuremberg-style trials would be appropriate as a response to alleged crimes committed during the Covid pandemic.

The concept of Nuremberg 2 trials appears to be more of a fantasy on political forums and social media websites than a viable response to perceive injustices.

Fact-checkers from Reuters previously rejected the idea that Covid-19 vaccines violate the Nuremberg code. At the time of writing, there does not exist a legal mechanism to prosecute world leaders in this fashion.

While the Covid-19 vaccine has lead to serious injury, and even death, in rare circumstances, it is still considered safe and effective by health authorities across the world.

Did you like this article? Consider a small donation. If you can’t afford to donate, consider sharing this article on your favourite social media platform!

Big tech is censoring us. Use the buttons to share this article!

Sign up for our newsletter to beat Big Tech censorship!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *